Editing Talk:Coma Black (a) Eden Eye

{{talkheader}}
== Why did we split the Coma Black article? ==
I'm not sure this article deserves a single own shard. First of all, Coma Black is a holistic track at the Holy Wood album. Second, such disintegrating things happen here not for the first time. Third, I would like to propose to join this article to the original Coma Black article and to refer it using '''<nowiki>[[Coma Black#(a) Eden Eye|(a) Eden Eye]]</nowiki>'''. I'm really concerned for the MansonWiki. Please comment. ([[User:Scarshock|scarshock]] 17:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC))
:Здесь творится полная херня, все делают что хотят 0_0 [[User:I4ig0|I4ig0]] 17:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
::Знаю. )) But please write in English, not in Russian, to be understood by everyone here. ;) ([[User:Scarshock|scarshock]] 17:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC))
*The actual [[Coma Black]] article still exists and the article for [[Coma Black (a) Eden Eye]] is for the shortened outro version of the song that the band sometimes attaches to the end of Coma White live. Sorta like the how the [[Hell Outro]] gets its own article. Though while I get the reasoning behind why the person split it, I don't really agree with it having its own article. We shouldn't just start making separate articles any time a song is used as an intro or outro or tease before another song because its so '''unnecessary'''. Just add a little note on Coma Black's page that says its used as an outro sometimes and delete this page [[User:Lagozzino|Lagozzino]] 17:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
::Lagozzino, I had a courage to rejoin the Eden Eye article back to the origin, fixing all pages that refer to it. The Coma Black article has now two new sections. I think those sections can exist in a single article describing necessary Coma Black aspects. ([[User:Scarshock|scarshock]] 17:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC))