Editing Anton LaVey

From MansonWiki, the Marilyn Manson encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in.

Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 27: Line 27:
 
On February 2, 1998, daughter Zeena LaVey and her husband Nikolas Schreck compiled and released ''Anton LaVey: Legend and Reality'' [http://www.thefirewithin.dk/library/anton.htm] which accused Anton LaVey of allowing for the sexual assault of Zeena's son Stanton LaVey (which Stanton denies having happened), falsifying information about his career and family life, and plagiarism. Zeena also contributed to an article on by D. Shawn Bosler titled ''The Devil in Disguise'' about the rumors of her father's release of organ music albums under the name "George Montalba." In response, Blanche Barton, Anton LaVey's biographer, released ''The Georges Montalba Mystery'' [http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/Montalba.html] countering these claims.
 
On February 2, 1998, daughter Zeena LaVey and her husband Nikolas Schreck compiled and released ''Anton LaVey: Legend and Reality'' [http://www.thefirewithin.dk/library/anton.htm] which accused Anton LaVey of allowing for the sexual assault of Zeena's son Stanton LaVey (which Stanton denies having happened), falsifying information about his career and family life, and plagiarism. Zeena also contributed to an article on by D. Shawn Bosler titled ''The Devil in Disguise'' about the rumors of her father's release of organ music albums under the name "George Montalba." In response, Blanche Barton, Anton LaVey's biographer, released ''The Georges Montalba Mystery'' [http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/Montalba.html] countering these claims.
  
In ''The Book of Satan'', "LaVey relied on a work called ''Might Is Right'' by Ragnar Redbeard to such an extent that it is clear that without so much as a footnote or bibliographic reference that LaVey plagiarized a significant portion of Ragnar Redbeard." [http://www.dpjs.co.uk/criticism/smulo.html#_ftnref137]. LaVey acknowledged the influence of ''Might Is Right'' by mentioning both it and Ragnar Redbeard in his dedication page of ''The Satanic Bible'' (only early prints of ''The Satanic Bible'' have this page), as well as in an introduction to a later edition of ''Might Is Right''. In an interview with LaVey a question regarding the book arose. LaVey responded by stating, "''Might Is Right'' by Ragnar Redbeard is probably one of the most inflammatory books ever written, so who better to write an introduction? It was only natural that I excerpted a few pages of it for ''The Satanic Bible''." LaVey went on to state that, "The book has been so indelibly linked with me, it was felt that any new edition should have my name on it."
+
In ''The Book of Satan'', "LaVey relied on a work called ''Might Is Right'' by Ragnar Redbeard to such an extent that it is clear that without so much as a footnote or bibliographic reference that LaVey plagiarized a significant portion of Ragnar Redbeard." [http://www.dpjs.co.uk/criticism/smulo.html#_ftnref137]. LaVey acknowledged the influence of ''Might Is Right'' by mentioning both it and Ragnar Redbeard in his dedication page of ''The Satanic Bible' (only early prints of ''The Satanic Bible'' have this page), as well as in an introduction to a later edition of ''Might Is Right''. In an interview with LaVey a question regarding the book arose. LaVey responded by stating, "''Might Is Right'' by Ragnar Redbeard is probably one of the most inflammatory books ever written, so who better to write an introduction? It was only natural that I excerpted a few pages of it for ''The Satanic Bible''." LaVey went on to state that, "The book has been so indelibly linked with me, it was felt that any new edition should have my name on it."
  
 
John Smulo, a known critic of Anton LaVey, has stated that, "Though LaVey justly charges that many Christians are guilty of hypocrisy, LaVey falls short himself. The sixth of LaVey's Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth says, ''"Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved."'' Unfortunately, when it came to writing The Satanic Bible, LaVey hypocritically fell short of following his own rules. Smulo further claimed LaVey's most well known written work, ''The Satanic Bible'' relied heavily on many writers of a philosophical nature, most notably Ayn Rand, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Aleister Crowley. LaVey has stated that, "His religion was "just Ayn Rand's philosophy, with ceremony and ritual added.", though many say that 'he should be given credit for his creative synthesis of the thought of others into what has become the most influential statement of modern Satanism.' LaVey has denied claims of plagiarism in ''The Satanic Bible''.
 
John Smulo, a known critic of Anton LaVey, has stated that, "Though LaVey justly charges that many Christians are guilty of hypocrisy, LaVey falls short himself. The sixth of LaVey's Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth says, ''"Do not take that which does not belong to you unless it is a burden to the other person and he cries out to be relieved."'' Unfortunately, when it came to writing The Satanic Bible, LaVey hypocritically fell short of following his own rules. Smulo further claimed LaVey's most well known written work, ''The Satanic Bible'' relied heavily on many writers of a philosophical nature, most notably Ayn Rand, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Aleister Crowley. LaVey has stated that, "His religion was "just Ayn Rand's philosophy, with ceremony and ritual added.", though many say that 'he should be given credit for his creative synthesis of the thought of others into what has become the most influential statement of modern Satanism.' LaVey has denied claims of plagiarism in ''The Satanic Bible''.

Please note that all contributions to The Marilyn Manson Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see The Marilyn Manson Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)