User talk:M1shael

From MansonWiki, the Marilyn Manson encyclopedia
Revision as of 14:55, 11 December 2009 by Godspeed (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

This is M1shael's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to M1shael.

  • Assume good faith.
  • Be welcoming.
  • No personal attacks.

Babalon links

Hello. I've just checked revisions of The High End of Low Tour performances, and I'm surprised by weird edits that are happening here. I don't know why ‡-me-‡ and Godspeed consider MansonWiki is a links storage. Ok, I understand if there could be any professional performance reviews and footages requirements, but anyway MansonWiki never required any links to poor forum topics. It breaks its style. Ok, I could see that Babalon as the official board could be more informative but a few Babalon topics on THEoL Tour performances I've just picked are just words of "oh, can't wait for today's performance" etc. I can't get it, who does care personal wishes if they do not relate to the encyclopedia? It breaks its style again and does not fit the requirements. Maybe I'm too categorical, but moreover I still consider that every fan knows about the Babalon board by default. I'm confused. (scarshock 14:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC))

Hi. I just changed their edits to a more correct view. And i agreed with you that It breaks its style. --M1shael 14:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


Note by [g]S

In Case anyone was unaware, Nick Kushner and the Nachtkabarett have taken over ownership of MansonWiki. Nick has appointed myself, [god]speed and <me> as administrators of Mansonwiki. We are going to be linking the Nacht and Babalon for further research. THEOL tour threads ALL contain Youtube.


Thank You


And so are bootlegs.

Not every fan that comes through here in say 5 years or 10 years will have the links to the tour threads filled with youtube videos and pictures if you have a problem take it up with Nick @ derlustmorder@aol.com or ask Litso. And the main thing with Wiki is that it SHOULD contain external links as it provides credibility.
I have nothing against about this. But it is unnecessary information... --M1shael 14:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

[g]S