Difference between revisions of "User talk:M1shael"

From MansonWiki, the Marilyn Manson encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{talkheader}} == Babalon links == Hello. I've just checked revisions of The High End of Low Tour performances, and I'm surprised by weird edits that are happening here. I don't know why...)
 
m (Babalon links)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Babalon links ==
 
== Babalon links ==
  
Hello. I've just checked revisions of The High End of Low Tour performances, and I'm surprised by weird edits that are happening here. I don't know why ‡-me-‡ and Godspeed consider MansonWiki is a links storage. Ok, I understand if there could be any '''professional''' performance reviews and footages requirements, but anyway MansonWiki never required any links to ''poor'' forum topics. It breaks its style. Ok, I could see that Babalon as the official board could be more informative but a few Babalon topics on THEoL Tour performances I've just picked are just words of "oh, can't wait for today's performance" etc. I can't get it, who does care personal wishes if they do not relate to the encyclopedia? It breaks its style again and does not fit the requirements. Maybe I'm too categorical, but morover I still consider that every fan knows about the Babalon board by default. I'm confused. ([[User:Scarshock|scarshock]] 14:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC))
+
Hello. I've just checked revisions of The High End of Low Tour performances, and I'm surprised by weird edits that are happening here. I don't know why ‡-me-‡ and Godspeed consider MansonWiki is a links storage. Ok, I understand if there could be any '''professional''' performance reviews and footages requirements, but anyway MansonWiki never required any links to ''poor'' forum topics. It breaks its style. Ok, I could see that Babalon as the official board could be more informative but a few Babalon topics on THEoL Tour performances I've just picked are just words of "oh, can't wait for today's performance" etc. I can't get it, who does care personal wishes if they do not relate to the encyclopedia? It breaks its style again and does not fit the requirements. Maybe I'm too categorical, but moreover I still consider that every fan knows about the Babalon board by default. I'm confused. ([[User:Scarshock|scarshock]] 14:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC))

Revision as of 14:18, 11 December 2009

This is M1shael's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to M1shael.

  • Assume good faith.
  • Be welcoming.
  • No personal attacks.

Babalon links

Hello. I've just checked revisions of The High End of Low Tour performances, and I'm surprised by weird edits that are happening here. I don't know why ‡-me-‡ and Godspeed consider MansonWiki is a links storage. Ok, I understand if there could be any professional performance reviews and footages requirements, but anyway MansonWiki never required any links to poor forum topics. It breaks its style. Ok, I could see that Babalon as the official board could be more informative but a few Babalon topics on THEoL Tour performances I've just picked are just words of "oh, can't wait for today's performance" etc. I can't get it, who does care personal wishes if they do not relate to the encyclopedia? It breaks its style again and does not fit the requirements. Maybe I'm too categorical, but moreover I still consider that every fan knows about the Babalon board by default. I'm confused. (scarshock 14:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC))