Revision as of 15:38, 16 May 2014

Lineup in articles and tourboxes

We have performers listed in the info box and then again under Lineup on individual tour pages. Is this overkill? The info boxes are already big now as it is. Thoughts? scarshock (talk), Harlequin (talk), MAFF'L (talk) Sumer (talk) 07:44, 10 May 2014 (CEST)

this was established a long-long time ago i'd like to keep it as it is. scarshock (talk) 13:06, 11 May 2014 (CEST)

And location. That's in two different places, too. I think this sample page should be redone to show a good blank templated page that can be copied over to a new page and just fill in the blanks. Sumer (talk) 17:11, 12 May 2014 (CEST)

An info box is a quick glance at facts contained within an article. It's usually expected: What should an infobox contain? Harlequin (talk)

Specifying both stage and real names

just curious: what's the point of specifying both stage and real names for cases like [[Scott Putesky|Daisy Berkowitz]] if [[Daisy Berkowitz]] still refers Scott Putesky saying that the page is redirected? (scarshock (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2014 (CEST))

I'm not sure of what usage as an example of what you mean, but band members are often referred to by their stage name with in articles. Harlequin (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2014 (CEST)

A little question

No space between end of Info Box template and About template.
but why? if there's a new line character, then visually the templates are separated and cleaner (scarshock (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2014 (CEST))

I agree, there should be a space between Harlequin (talk)

Either way renders the same visual result. I think I said that because I saw it being done that way before. Sumer (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2014 (CEST)